The Building

Building pre-intervention

Building pre-intervention: 01.Castello Doragno PRIMA.jpg

Building post-intervention

Building post-intervention: 01.Castello Doragno ATTUALEJPG.jpg
Building post-intervention: 46 SUPSI_Doragno Castle_External Wall_1.jpg
Building post-intervention: SUPSI_Doragno Castle_Photo _1_A _DSC0900_001.jpg
Building post-intervention: SUPSI_Doragno Castle_Photo_2_A _Doragno ATTUALEJPG_014 b.jpg
Building post-intervention: SUPSI_Doragno Castle_Photo_3_DSC0839_008.jpg
Building post-intervention: SUPSI_Doragno Castle_Photo_4_2.jpg
Building post-intervention: SUPSI_Doragno Castle_Photo_DSC1895_004.jpg
Building post-intervention: SUPSI_Doragno Castle_Photo_DSC1899_005.jpg
Building post-intervention: SUPSI_Doragno Castle_Photo_DSC5989_006.jpg
Building post-intervention: SUPSI_Doragno Castle_Photo_DSC6059_007.jpg

Doragno Castle

The castle of foragno, a private residence situated in Ticino, emerges from the thoughtful restoration and extension of an ancient medieval castle, now serving as a single-family house. This historic, unlisted building has been modernized to meet NZEB (Nearly Zero-Energy Building) standards, featuring an innovative roof integrated with photovoltaic systems and solar collectors. The transformation preserves the original stone walls, which are accentuated by large windows that seamlessly blend into the existing structure, marrying old-world charm with modern energy solutions.

More Details

The Solution

Solution post-intervention

Solution post-intervention: Screenshot 2025-08-25 144524.png
What is the Solution?

The restoration project started from the right premise of completing what remained of the tower walls to return the original shape, so that in the surrounding landscape the building of the past once again became legible. In parallel, the energy retrofit included the internal insulation of the existing stone masonry walls with expanded polystyrene (EPS, Swisspor EPS 30) panels applied behind plasterboard layers. The insulation was placed on the inner side of the external walls, with typical thickness of 10 cm (up to 16 cm in some cases), reducing the U-value of the walls from about 0.98 W/m²K to 0.25 W/m²K

Why Does it work?

In this project we have re-created the shape of the castle using modern materials that differ from the original ones but don't dominate and discretely approach to ancient parts.

PROS
  • The internal insulation solution preserves the external appearance of the historic stone masonry, as all new layers are added on the interior side, leaving the original façade exposed. This approach allows for the flexible installation of technical systems, thanks to the dedicated air gap and support frame used for the mounting of insulation panels. Additionally, the dry construction method with plasterboard finishing makes the intervention fully reversible, permitting future modifications or removal without affecting the historic fabric.
CONS
  • The internal application of the insulation system results in a reduction of usable interior space, as the new layers (insulation, air gap, and plasterboard) are added to the inside of the existing walls. Furthermore, the intervention covers the original internal stonework, altering the historic appearance of interior spaces. In addition, the solution must be carefully verified from a hygrothermal perspective to exclude risks of moisture-related damages, such as those caused by driving rain or interstitial condensation. Finally, the vapour barrier must be installed with great care and continuity, since any interruption can compromise its function and lead to failures in moisture control.
Insulation material
EPS
Insulation thickness
100
Thermal conductivity
0.033
Health issue
information not available
Installation Method
A support frame was installed in the air gap between the insulation and the masonry to hold the panels and create space for installations. The system is dry-mounted with plasterboard finish.
Moisture Management and Technical Compatibility
A polyethylene vapor barrier (Sd = 750 m) was applied between the insulation and the masonry. Hygrothermal performance was evaluated: the surface temperature factor (frsi) reached 0.919, above the safety thresholds for condensation (0.721) and mould growth (0.750).
Airtightness
Airtightness is provided by the vapour barrier.

Before retrofit

After retrofit

Before retrofit
Wall thickness
530
After retrofit
Wall thickness
647
Before retrofit
Wall build-up
Stone wall [500], Plaster [30]
After retrofit
Wall build-up
Stone wall (extension stone + brick) [500mm], Insulation [100mm], Vapour barrier [2mm], Air layer [30mm], Plasterboard (internal) [15mm]
Before retrofit
U-value
0.9
After retrofit
U-value
0.24

Assessment

Wall type
Masonry Wall
Insulation position
Inside
Moisture handling approach
Moisture-Closed
Plaster/imperfections
No
Wall thickness increase
Large Variation (> 4 cm)
Wall U-value
U <=0.25
Insulation type
Synthetic
Circular approach
No
Reversibility
Yes
Investment cost
Medium Low

Location

Rovio, Switzerland - 497m
Climatic Zone:Cfb